2006-10-05

Are Republicans or Democrats Better for the Stock Market?

Yer ni enexuu asuult yamar xariulttai bdag um bol xaigaad u'zsen bodoj bsan shig maani o'or o'or xariu garch bna. Xen, xerxen, yaj sudalsnaas, bas deer ni uls to'r orson esexees xamaarna.

"...For the stock market to ignore Bush's unpopularity seems strange. The vast majority of large stockholders and active traders are Republicans, and Republican rhetoric is generally very market-friendly." (more ...posted 3/21/2006) (http://finance.yahoo.com)

"...Many investors assume that Republican presidents are better for the stock market. That's not true." (more... posted 12/2/2005) (http://www.usatoday.com)

"...But Democrats, it turns out, are much better for the stock market than Republicans. Slate ran the numbers and found that since 1900, Democratic presidents have produced a 12.3 percent annual total return on the S&P 500, but Republicans only an 8 percent return." (more... posted 10/4/2002) (http://www.slate.com)

"...Looking at the 72-year period between 1927 and 1999, the study shows that a broad stock index, similar to the S&P 500, returned approximately 11 percent more a year on average under a Democratic president versus safer, three-month Treasurys. By comparison, the index only returned 2 percent more a year versus the T-bills when Republicans were in office. (more... posted 1/22/2004) (
http://money.cnn.com)

"...What I found, in contrast to the published data, was that the Republicans win this particular contest, with a compound annual return of 5.58% for Republican Presidents, and 5.12% for Democratic Presidents. The numbers do not change appreciably if you start from 1900, which is what the popular statistics I have seen are based on. " (more ... posted ?) (http://home.comcast.net/~truthsucks)

No comments: